ACommissionReviewer's avatar

ACommissionReviewer

50 Watchers38 Deviations
64.9K
Pageviews
www.nbcnews.com/politics/elect…

Top Department of Homeland Security Official Jeanette Manfra said:"We saw a targeting of 21 states and an exceptionally small number of them were actually successfully penetrated."

I tried to think of the perfect thing to say to Trump supporters about this, but I just figured a video would help:

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
NDP SJW defeats himselfSeriously, with the statistics he used to try and prove me wrong, it only showed Pakistanis to be among the Asians. Plus if Muslims were mentioned in the conversation, why else would I assume they were Pakistani? Yet he makes classical excuses on why whites weren't treated with dignity while calling anyone who says that it's okay to be white, a white supremacist. Also, how many of you think that going against the establishment is all about political parties? The NDP isn't new or alternative but more of the big government bureaucracy offering the same rhetoric as the liberal left leaning parties. It should figure why he's an SJW.
Plus does one expect to only have one police inspector? This SJW is nothing but an attention seeker hoping to mooch off my views seeing as my account is bigger now. Well at least he admitted that he made a mistake, oh wait, no, that was me. :bademoticon: 


Seriously Michael aka MissouriPatriot ? You felt the need to continue this discussion when you were clearly in the wrong? Jesus you're like the black knight from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, you lose your arms and legs yet you continue to fight. However this is just sad and cringe worthy because you are still pretending to your followers that you have not lost, thus you must misrepresent me by missing the point of my arguments in favor of your own version of them. I'm hoping this'll be the last because there's nothing really else to say at this point to say to him that he won't in some may misrepresent so he can jerk his dick off to in his little bubble. Thankfully it looks like this'll be his last post as he is too busy grasping at straws and giving me labels like "Canadian leftist", "Canacuck", and now "NDP SJW". Let's just get this over with, link to his post above and I'll link my last response below:

Doing the Tango Again Michael?Yesterday I made a post responding to Michael's aka MissouriPatriot's response to my response to him posting fake shit again. Believe it or not, even though I basically refuted everything he had stated he once again made another response. You know Michael I wouldn't be making so many posts on this same topic if you didn't have my blocked. This all could've been done in the comments but no, you had to be a pussy and blocked those who disagree with you. Furthermore why continue to respond to my posts? Isn't the point of blocking someone is to ignore them? The only reason why I see for you blocking me is for censorship and so you can easily misrepresent me to your tiny audience without giving me a chance to defend myself on the posts. So much for freedom of speech that you claim to proudly support. Anyways he made a much smaller post this time around so hopefully we don't have to make a overly long response but it's fucking Michael, he could just say one poorly written sentence and that

"Seriously, with the statistics he used to try and prove me wrong, it only showed Pakistanis to be among the Asians"

One sentence, it just took one sentence for you to completely miss the point entirely. I used those statistics to show that Pakistanis weren't the minor majority, but rather Indians, then Asian Asians. This was to counter your claim that the Muslims Pakistani demographic was the majority, at least that is how you wrote the claim to be like. I did show that Pakistanis were included in the Asian statistics, I never denied that in the first place. What I was arguing was that the attackers were Asian Asian, not Asian Pakistani. If they were specifically Pakistani Nikki would've said so, no reason for her to not be specific with who attacked her. What would make more sense Michael; her saying that 3 Asian men attacked her because the men were Asian Asian, or her saying that 3 Asian men attacked her but really the men were Pakistani? I know you want to say the ladder because you think Muslims are "sand maggots" but reasonable thought is not on your side here dude, but that's not someone uncommon with a lot of your posts.

"
 Plus if Muslims were mentioned in the conversation, why else would I assume they were Pakistani?"

Well for starters not everyone who is Pakistani ethnicity are Muslim by default. Yes the majority of Pakistanis tend to be Muslim but Muslim isn't bounded by race. In fact the country with the highest percentage of the world's muslim population is Indonesia, AN ASIAN MAJORITY NATION where 95% of the population are NATIVE INDONESIAN. 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demograp…

So your own logic here is flawed because out of all the countries with Muslim majorities Indonesia has the higher percentage. So by default you would assume ASIAN, not Pakistani. Unless of course you have such a low level of knowledge on Muslims that you only think people who're of the religion fit every stereotype. But you never go off of stereotypes right? You've never called Muslims "sand maggots" before at all. No no that's just not you Michael.

"
Yet he makes classical excuses on why whites weren't treated with dignity while calling anyone who says that it's okay to be white, a white supremacist."

Yet again Michael I don't call you a white supremacist because you say it's okay to be white. I call you a white supremacist because not only have you aligned yourself with white supremacist symbols, but also carried the same chant used by the white supremacists during the Charlottesville riots:

Michael the White Supremacist by ACommissionReviewer

Not only that but you believe and actively spread the outright lie white supremacists and neo-nazis use like the "White genocide" one and now "The Great Replacement" too. You cannot do any of those three things and NOT call yourself a white supremacist. Deny it all you want Michael but everyone outside of your little bubble of alternate reality knows it, whether or not you're willing to accept this fact or continue to pretend it's not true is entirely up to you.

"
Also, how many of you think that going against the establishment is all about political parties? The NDP isn't new or alternative but more of the big government bureaucracy offering the same rhetoric as the liberal left leaning parties. It should figure why he's an SJW."

Not everyone who is a liberal is an SJW. I know you said yourself that you consider all liberals SJWs but thankfully we don't live in a world where you dictate how things are. I'm trying to understand the first half of your comment, as if to suggest that not all parties are apart of the establishment. I'm going to take a wild guess and say you think the right wing PC party are the ones who aren't apart of the establishment huh? 

"
Plus does one expect to only have one police inspector? This SJW is nothing but an attention seeker hoping to mooch off my views seeing as my account is bigger now. Well at least he admitted that he made a mistake, oh wait, no, that was me"

Did I say there wasn't more than one inspector in the West Yorkshire police department? No I didn't. I was only talking about the inspector RELEVANT to the case because Mohammed was leading it. I was pointing out how flawed your logic was that an award winning inspector would just abandon a case to not upset the Muslims solely based on the fact his first name was Mohammed. This is the thing you've yet to properly understand because you are so up your own ass that you can't admit you were wrong about this conspiracy theory. The attackers weren't Pakistani they were Asian, the inspector you claim is doing nothing to not upset the Muslims solely based off of his first name is just wrong on so many levels, no one actually knows the religions of the attackers and the only reason why you think they're Muslim is because Rebel Media suggested it even though they have a long history of Islamophobia.

Keep patting yourself on the back for admitting you meant to say it was the inspector who's name was Mohammed instead of the "leader of the police force". Funny how you admit being wrong on the most forgivable thing you did wrong out of this entire shitshow of yours. I'm not mooching off of your views though. It's not like you link me at all in your posts like I do for you, so my viewers come to visit your page. You don't do the same for me because if people actually saw the things I said instead of what you mislead them into believing they'd see you for the joke you were. Along with that you spam your shit into multiple different right wing groups and pages who don't both fact checking the shit you say. Why do you even care about the views in the first place? Not like you're making money off of them at all or those views carry over to your youtube channel. Looking at your views you've actually been going DOWN in them with your most popular video being less than 1k while mine has gone over 1k and has a better likes to dislikes ratio, and that's with less subscribers and activity! So who's mooching off of who? I don't care really because I don't post here for the views, I post to give criticism to people who try to manipulate others into falling for hateful propaganda like what you make Michael. Grow some balls and learn to some decency ya dingus. 
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Yesterday I made a post responding to Michael's aka MissouriPatriot's response to my response to him posting fake shit again. Believe it or not, even though I basically refuted everything he had stated he once again made another response. You know Michael I wouldn't be making so many posts on this same topic if you didn't have my blocked. This all could've been done in the comments but no, you had to be a pussy and blocked those who disagree with you. Furthermore why continue to respond to my posts? Isn't the point of blocking someone is to ignore them? The only reason why I see for you blocking me is for censorship and so you can easily misrepresent me to your tiny audience without giving me a chance to defend myself on the posts. So much for freedom of speech that you claim to proudly support. Anyways he made a much smaller post this time around so hopefully we don't have to make a overly long response but it's fucking Michael, he could just say one poorly written sentence and that alone could trigger a paragraph response. I'll like my last response to him below along with his new one. I recommend reading both before continuing, that is if Michael hasn't already blocked you. So just sit back and enjoy I guess:

My last response:  Hi Michael, Thanks for the Response.After I made my post on Michael falling for more fake news, I was quite hopeful that he'd actually do something like a response. Mostly because I wanted to see how someone like him would defend these sort of claims that he was making. Since I cited two credible sources that were reporting on the issue and considering how much he stalks my page. Being as predictable as ever he did in fact make a response. It's rather short for a response but hey what can ya do? I'm sure he was preoccupied with Disney porn to bother writing more. I don't know why he feels the need to call me "Canadian leftist" though, he's been calling me that for a while. Maybe he doesn't know what gender I am considering the fact he thought I was a girl for at least 3 weeks. I'm a dude by the way Michael, just to tell ya. Anyways let's go through with what Michael aka MissouriPatriot had to say about my exposure:

"The nerve of these people disgusts me. This Canadian leftist cuck has said that


His new response:  Canacuck strikes againI must thank him because his stupidity in sharing my posts is actually helping me get more views and get the message out. My one error is saying that the police chief was named Mohammed when really it was the police inspector. Plus that same stupid dope said that I was being an idiot because she referred to the attackers as Asian. So that settles it, that they must be from Korea, Japan, or China right? Oh wait a minuet, this same Canadian cuck actually thinks that the culture in Great Britain as well as how we address other peoples is the same in the UK as it is in Canada.Aww Yea 3D - Emoticon Laugh Foxy cute ROFL chat icon Freddy Laughing Chat Icon 
The fact that these accusations are so hilarious is that this cuck is so ignorant on the British culture. What we Americans and Canadians refer to as Asians is narrowed down in comparison to what the Brit


"I must thank him because his stupidity in sharing my posts is actually helping me get more views and get the message out."

Well of course I'm going to spread the message out that you're a dumbass, why wouldn't I? I'm pretty sure the reason why your post is getting more views is because it's being featured in the 9 groups that don't have any quality control for what is submitted. 

"
My one error is saying that the police chief was named Mohammed when really it was the police inspector."

Well you actually made several errors, one of which you aren't admitting to because you never actually called the chief of police the police chief, instead you said she was the leader of the police force for whatever reason. You at least admitted to being wrong about the name of the inspector wrong, however I'm sure this is going to lead to something very soon.

"
 Plus that same stupid dope said that I was being an idiot because she referred to the attackers as Asian. So that settles it, that they must be from Korea, Japan, or China right? Oh wait a minuet, this same Canadian cuck actually thinks that the culture in Great Britain as well as how we address other peoples is the same in the UK as it is in Canada."

I beg your pardon? Are you suggesting that people in the UK when referring to someone as Asian they don't actually mean they are? Are you fucking HIGH? If they are referring to someone who is ethnically ASIAN, they are referring to them being ethnically ASIAN. 

"
The fact that these accusations are so hilarious is that this cuck is so ignorant on the British culture. What we Americans and Canadians refer to as Asians is narrowed down in comparison to what the Brits refer to as Asians. What the Brits refer to as Asians includes Indians and Pakistanis"

It's hard to really explain how stupid of a counter argument this is because of how little sense it makes. If in any case the context is correct and she was just referring to people from the continent of Asia, why the fuck was she not specific with her answer? Why tell police that they were Asian if she really meant a more specific ethnicity? How do you know she wasn't talking about people who ARE Asian or even Indian for that matter? You know how much of a STRETCH this is for you? I believe she was referring to people who are Asian because she said they were Asian multiple times without suggesting anything else otherwise. Meanwhile you on the other based off of nothing the inspector's first name that she was not talking about people who are Asian but instead who were Pakistani even though she never once said they were Pakistani. I decided to google the inspector to see what I could find and it turns out he's not just an inspector, he's an award winning inspector:

www.westyorkshire.police.uk/ne…

So based off of nothing but the name, Michael thinks this decorated police inspector is not helping this woman and covering up for the attackers which Michael claims are Pakistani because Pakistan is in Asia and she said Asian so obviously that means Pakistani not people who are actually ethnically Asian; because he doesn't want to upset the Muslims. What a fucking crock of SHIT. You know what would happen if you tried using that as a legal defense or justification for arresting someone? You'd get thrown out of the courtroom. You need more than just a FIRST NAME and an assumption to arrest someone. 

"
 Plus the so-called reliable sources he claims to use put the attack on Nikki as "racist" as if it weren't really racist."

They're the same sources Rebel Media used you moron. I already mentioned this in the last post. If you're referring to the questions around racist in the articles, it's because they're QUOTING THE POLICE. Did you not READ it at all?

"
In the interview with Tommy Robinson, she said what had happened and she was attacked for being white. Plus in the interview, she even admitted that they wouldn't dare upset MUSLIMS meaning that these were from an ethnic minority that so happened to be Muslim majority."

So she made a claim without any evidence outside of just suspicion lead on by Tommy. I looked up the ethnicity population for West Yorkshire and here are the results:

Ethnicity
81.8% White
11.6% S. Asian
2.1% Mixed
2.1% Black
2.4% Other

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Yor…

This one from the Guardian is similar: 

The order: White, mixed, Asian/ Asian British, Black, Chinese
West Yorkshire (Met County) 81.55 1.81 10.21 1.90 0.46

www.theguardian.com/news/datab…

According to the more detailed schematics Indian is the largest out of the Asian population, next is Asian and then Pakistani.   

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Yor…

Assuming that you were trying to argue that the Muslim population is the majority while ethnically white people were the minority. You wrote that sentence so poorly that it's hard to actually understand at first glance.

"It turns out that this Canacuck is just a sheep that won't expand his horizons beyond his own culture and his own bias that he's spoon fed from the mainstream."

#1 - It's Cancuck, not Canacuk. 
#2 - I already mentioned how Rebel Media in this context is larger than Huddersfield daily, so if anyone is following mainstream media sources here it's you dude.
#3 - I have been to several countries in my life time and I have widened myself to many different cultures. You seem to travel as well but instead of embracing the cultures and learn from them you compare them to your own to try and make your's seem better. 

"
He claims that he isn't PC but a member of the NDP. Are you kidding me? The NDP is the Liberal party on steroids and is generally backed by virtue signaling millennial twits. It appears from the impression they leave off of us is that the nation of Canada today is a nation of SJWs, faggots, and playboys who hire journalists and politicians to do their thinking for them."

Oh my god Michael you're actually giving me a headache at this point. You seemingly missed the joke I made where you called me a PC (politically correct) sheep when I turned it around making it seem like you were referring to the PC party. Then he went on a tantrum about how Canada is nothing more than SJWs, faggots and playboys who bribe people. Talk about expanding your horizon dude, you've most likely never been to Canada. You're losing this discussion Michael, it's time to just drop it like you usually do when I rekt your ass. 
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
After I made my post on Michael falling for more fake news, I was quite hopeful that he'd actually do something like a response. Mostly because I wanted to see how someone like him would defend these sort of claims that he was making. Since I cited two credible sources that were reporting on the issue and considering how much he stalks my page. Being as predictable as ever he did in fact make a response. It's rather short for a response but hey what can ya do? I'm sure he was preoccupied with Disney porn to bother writing more. I don't know why he feels the need to call me "Canadian leftist" though, he's been calling me that for a while. Maybe he doesn't know what gender I am considering the fact he thought I was a girl for at least 3 weeks. I'm a dude by the way Michael, just to tell ya. Anyways let's go through with what Michael aka MissouriPatriot had to say about my exposure:

Canadian leftist lies about MeThe nerve of these people disgusts me. This Canadian leftist cuck has said that I fell for fake news when I reported the truth about a white girl who was attacked by a group of racist Pakistanis in Yorkshire. Basically, he said that I had no information on whether or not these racists who assaulted her were Muslim. In her interview with Tommy Robinson, Mr. Robinson informs us that the leader of the police force there is named Mohammed, there is your first clue, Mohammed, a common name for young Muslim men in honor of their pedophile prophet. She also said that the police force wouldn't do anything to upset the Muslims in any way, shape, or form.
Also, a third reason is that labeling them as Muslim attackers would breach those biased tyrannical hate speech laws in the UK. It turns out that these leftist Canadian cucks are self loathing PC sheep who will just follow whatever the big media and newspapers say. What's even more disgusting is when these newspapers published the information a


"The nerve of these people disgusts me. This Canadian leftist cuck has said that I fell for fake news when I reported the truth about a white girl who was attacked by a group of racist Pakistanis in Yorkshire."

Way to start off eh? First of all when you say "these people" do you mean Canadians, liberals, Canadian liberals or did you just get confused? Secondly you did fall for fake news as I explained in my post that The Rebel has a history of anti-Muslim beliefs. Maybe I should've cited the great video by Youtuber and terrible Rocket League player Shaun that covered the whole thing:

 

Will you watch it? Most likely you won't but hey other people may want to see it for themselves. Thirdly you again claim that the men who attacked Nikki were Pakistani, even though according to the Huddersfield Daily SHE HERSELF said that the men were Asian. Not even the Rebel Media source you gave said that the men were Pakistani, which means you're just full of shit dude. I'll link the article again because it seems like you can't be bothered to READ:

www.examiner.co.uk/news/west-y…

So it's not so much that you "reported the truth", you just wanted to share something that gave you an Islamophobe hard on.

"Basically, he said that I had no information on whether or not these racists who assaulted her were Muslim."

First of all I wasn't just saying you had no information on it, NO ONE DOES. The only link you provided to make that claim was the Rebel Media one and as I said before that alone isn't enough. None of the other sources that were credible made any mention of the men being Muslim, mostly because it's basically impossible to know a person's religion by looking at them unless they fit the stereotypical imagining of what the person would look like and I'm pretty sure the stereotypical look of a Muslim is not Asian. Secondly I said that you also had no information suggesting the men were Pakistani, in fact the evidence is AGAINST you because Nikki said the men were Asian. People who are ethnically Pakistani aren't Asian, you just wanted to add more to the tire fire that is your post.  Along with that while watching the video they show a facebook screenshot from here WHERE SHE STATS THE MEN WERE ASIAN, NOT PAKISTANI:

2017-12-06 by ACommissionReviewer

So you have two separate times when she said that the men were Asian. THEY EVEN CITE THE SOURCE I USED YA DINGUS:

2017-12-06 (1) by ACommissionReviewer

www.examiner.co.uk/news…

Again, she doesn't say the men were Pakistani or Muslim at all. Rebel Media is also using the same source I'M USING. On a side note I didn't actually get to really talk about the video itself mostly because I wanted it to focus more on Michael's comments. However in the video they try to pretend like she got no real Media attention outside of a small section in the newspaper, yet not realizing they already debunked that claim by showing the FULL article by Huddersfield. She also says that they refused point blank to call it a racial attack, however that's most likely because they didn't want to jump to conclusions right out of the gate. They did say the attacks were racially motivated, investigations do take time ya know? I'm surprised they took 18 days to conclude it was a racial attack, I would've waited longer before going down that road. We'll go back to the video later but the point is Michael NO ONE said that the men were Pakistani and the only people who said the men were Muslim was Rebel Media. 

" In her interview with Tommy Robinson, Mr. Robinson informs us that the leader of the police force there is named Mohammed, there is your first clue, Mohammed, a common name for young Muslim men in honor of their pedophile prophet. She also said that the police force wouldn't do anything to upset the Muslims in any way, shape, or form."

...Michael

THAT'S NOT A CLUE YA DINGUS.


There is so much WRONG with this statement it's ridiculous. First of all Michael the "leader of the police" is called the chief of police alright? How the fuck do you not know that shit? Secondly just because someone's name is connected to a religion doesn't mean that the person is of that religion or has anything to do with it. I had a co-worker who was a Muslim and his name was Christian. You can't just jump to conclusions based off of someone's NAME. Thirdly the statement by Nikki in regards to the police not wanting to upset the Muslims was made in an emotional moment for her and in utter desperation. If she actually did think what she said why not say it in the facebook post? Why not tell the media that? Why continue saying the men are Asian when you think it's all some cover up? You're at the point Michael that you can't even make a single rational thought... You know why Michael? On top of everything else I said here... this is West Yorkshire's Police Chief:
2017-12-06 (2) by ACommissionReviewer

www.westyorkshire.police.uk/ab…


Can you read that Michael? Let me repeat it this time in bold:

CHIEF CONSTABLE DEE COLLINS


The chief's name is NOT MOHAMMED. It took me 2 seconds to find this information out and you couldn't be bothered to do so because you were too busy jacking your Islamophobic dick off. Tommy lied, you and Nikki both fell for it. Nikki has an excuse though because of her situation, you on the other hand don't. 

"Also, a third reason is that labeling them as Muslim attackers would breach those biased tyrannical hate speech laws in the UK."

Do you even know about anything that you talk about? Are you in such a seclusive bubble that you don't even know the difference between what is and isn't hate speech? Saying Muslims attackers isn't hate speech, calling Muslims "sand maggots" though is. If you're trying to breach the law you're not doing a great job at it because only once you've said "sand maggots". Technically this entire piece you did could be considered hate speech because it's utterly false in it's narrative and you're just trying to insight more anti-Muslim outrage. Also why the fuck do you even care? It's not like your media sources are getting censored at all. 

"
t turns out that these leftist Canadian cucks are self loathing PC sheep who will just follow whatever the big media and newspapers say."

#1 - I'm not a PC sheep, I'm NDP ya dingus. I know you mean Politically Correct and but how is fact checking your shit and NOT making baseless claims being PC?
#2 - If by "big media" you mean a local evening newspaper company. You can't just call any source that disagrees with you "big media", especially when YOUR OWN SOURCE USES IT. 
#3 - Also the Rebel Media twitter page has more followers than the Huddersfield Daily twitter page does so technically Rebel Media is the bigger network here, hypocrite much.

twitter.com/Examiner?ref_src=t…
twitter.com/TheRebelTV?ref_src…

"
What's even more disgusting is when these newspapers published the information about the attack on Nikki, they put racist in quotation marks as if whites can't possibly be victims of racism."

You realize they were quoting the police right? That's why it's in quotation marks, because someone said that the attacks were racially motivated. Sure some people use quotations to suggest otherwise but in the context of both articles I had neither of them used it in a demeaning fashion. All they were doing was quoting the POLICE. 

"
 Is it any wonder why European bloods turn to white nationalism when they are deemed of less worth and value than others because of their brown or black skin color and have the law on their side?"

Is it any wonder why every rational person will mock and laugh at white nationalists like you who tries and fails to get people to believe the horseshit you produce. You and Rebel Media took a racially motivated incident involving a white woman being severely attacked by 3 Asian men and turned it into a racially motivated incident involving a white woman being 
severely attacked by three Pakistani Muslims where the police didn't do anything because they didn't want to upset the Muslims because the police chief was named Mohammed.  You're a fucking idiot Michael.

"
They have no right to call the alt-right white supremacists when they have ignored the hate crimes going on against white people because they don't have the moral high ground."

Michael what moral high ground do you have? You actively spread misinformation about an incident in order to make people pissed off towards Muslims as if all Muslims were responsible for this. No one actually knows the religions of the 3 Asian men, they could've been Satanists for all we know. If you want people to give a shit, stop making up shit. 

"
Well the failed trade negotiations with China is what Canada gets for their cuckoldry."

Do you REAAAAALLLY want to play this game of pointing fingers Michael? With Trump as your president... are you suuuuuuuuuuuuure that's a smart idea? 

Let's look at a few comments now! : D

"
Thank you.  Canadian Leftists = Anakin/Vader. MissouriPatriot = Obi Wan."

-Fujin777

You realize Vader killed the emperor right? Did you even watch Star Wars?

Michael comes back with

"
I have failed you Canadians. I have failed you."

-MissouriPatriot

Your parents are the ones who failed Michael, you did fail but you failed at manipulating people into your ridiculous beliefs. 

I don't think we'll be getting another response from Michael after this, well when it comes to this topic. I can't see what he could refute without looking like an idiot, hypocrite, racist or all of the both mixed together. Maybe someone should let his parents who know who needs a spanking again. Hopefully they'll knock though before entering in on his Islamic Disney Princess wank session. 


Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
I'm sure anyone in the Controversy.Inc group will have seen this post by Michael aka MissouriPatriot in this feed:



When I first saw it I thought that the image ITSELF was faked because of how badly she looked. However after doing some background searching that this is real, however Michael's version of what happened is not. Michael wrote:

"And now this happens in Great Britain because those Tory led police force treat white ethnic brits like second class citizens and treat sand maggots from Pakistan like gods. This was a racist attack upon her just for being British. Please sign the petition below as to make sure Nikki gets justice for this beating she has received."

He then links a Rebel petition/article which goes into more detail what they think happened. First of all gotta love how he doesn't call the attackers Muslim, but instead "sand maggots". Are you still gonna say you aren't racist Michael? Oh wait you have me blocked so I can't see what you say on your page. Instead of course you'll say something about me in a status when you are all safe in your little bubble, shielding you from any criticism. On a side note I thought the new rules for Controversy.Inc said you can't talk about someone if you have them blocked. Correct me if I'm wrong but that was what I thought the rule was. How is Michael still apart of this group???

Anyways he also says the men were from Pakistan, we'll get to this bit later but keep that in mind. As we look towards the Rebel petition/article it says and quote:

"In the early morning hours of October 31st, Nikki Hurst was walking in Batley, UK, when three Muslim men approached her and asked for a light. When she told them she didn’t have one, they launched into a tirade of verbal abuse, calling her a “gori slag” – a derogatory name often used by Muslims for white girls.

The three men then grabbed Nikki, smashed her face into a stone wall, and ran away. She regained consciousness alone, some 30 minutes later, with a large wound on her forehead. She suffered serious facial injuries that have left permanent scars.

But despite this all happening one month ago, Nikki says the police have still not taken her statement. Desperate for justice, Nikki posted photographs of her injuries online – only for the police to advise her that she could potentially incite riots by publishing her story.

Batley’s Police Inspector Mohammed Rauf doesn’t appear to be planning to investigate this racist attack. Nikki knows the assailants go to a local school, and she can even tell the police what class they are in thanks to their school uniforms. But still, nothing has been done."

 uk.therebel.media/justiceforni…

Quite an interesting tale Rebel has here. However what if I told you all of what Michael and Rebel has said was fake? That it didn't happen? Well this is why I double check and research the topic before believing them. After a quick google image search I found this article from the Mirror, a British news site and this one by Huddersfield Daily, they're basically the same article with minor differences. Both were released November 29th while the petition went up November 28th if the youtube video accompanying it was posted at the same time. Allow me to quote the Mirror article as since both are the same:

"A woman has been left with horrific injuries after she was kicked and punched in an attack being treated as "racially motivated".
Nikki Hurst has been left with a huge wound to her head and serious facial injuries following the brutal assault.
She claimed the attack was carried out by three Asian men.
Police in Batley, West Yorkshire, confirmed they are treating the assault as "racially motivated" at this stage.
Nikki 32, says she was attacked as she was walking at 6:45am.
The men approached her and launched verbal abuse, before pushing her and kicking her.
She described falling to the ground, sustaining the head wound and serious facial injuries as a result.
Today the force confirmed enquiries were ongoing, reports the Huddersfield Examiner.
Det Insp Mark Atkinson, of Kirklees CID, said: “This was a terrible incident and one which left the victim with very serious injuries. We have been in regular contact with her to enable us to investigate the incident fully.
“I would like to appeal to members of the public who have witnessed the incident or have any information to come forward and assist with our investigation.”
Anyone with any information or anyone who witnessed what happened is asked to contact police via 101 quoting crime reference 13170506171." 


www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/…

"Police are continuing to investigate a report of a racist attack on a woman in Batley.
Last week Nikki Hurst, 32, said she had been attacked by three Asian males when she was walking in Lady Ann Road in Batley.
She said the attack, near to the Mill Village Shopping Complex, happened on October 31 at 6.45am when the men approached her and launched verbal abuse, before pushing her and kicking her.
She described falling to the ground, sustaining the head wound and serious facial injuries as a result.
A video showing Nikki’s injuries has been circulating online.
Today the force confirmed enquiries were ongoing.
Their statement follows a report last Tuesday in which police described the attack as “racially aggravated”. At the time Det Insp Mark Atkinson, of Kirklees CID, said: “This was a terrible incident and one which left the victim with very serious injuries. We have been in regular contact with her to enable us to investigate the incident fully.
“I would like to appeal to members of the public who have witnessed the incident or have any information to come forward and assist with our investigation.”
Anyone with any information or anyone who witnessed what happened is asked to contact police via 101 quoting crime reference 13170506171.


www.examiner.co.uk/news/west-y…

Quite interesting honestly. These were the two most reliable articles I could find and both have no mention of the attackers being Muslim, being from Pakistan, or even knowing really anything about the three attackers. Heck only in the Mirror article does it mention the fact she claimed the attackers were Asian. So even in that sense she could be wrong because it was just a claim. They do mention that the investigation is ongoing and they are open to taking witness statements and that the police believes the attack to be radially motivated. But how in what way could've Rebel Media and Michael draw the conclusion the men were Muslims? Hmmm....

Well here's what happened based off of everything here: Rebel Media saw the opportunity to make a anti-Muslim story from this event, considering it being looked at as racially motivated. Rebel Media has done this shit before when it came to the Quebec Mosque shooting where they kept hinting and leaning towards the idea of the shooter being Muslim when he actually wasn't. They make this story up, then Michael here sees it and spread the post out more adding in his own bullshit information by claiming the men were from Pakistan, even though none of the sites make that claim, not even the Rebel source makes that statement. Michael's been on a rampage of hammering his belief that white people are facing serious oppression and all sorts of shit like white genocide/the great replacement because he loves to play victim and hates Muslims. He's a white supremacist so what do you expect? 

I know it's not surprising to see Michael continuously fall for fake news but this just goes along with the long line of shit he's been spewing onto this site. I'm honestly concerned he'll get even worse, maybe another ban would help him relax. He seemingly spends all day on the internet aside from the times his parents drag him out of his room to see the world. It doesn't take long for him to find his way back onto his computer and to continue falling down the endless hole of far right bullshit though. I hope he reads this because I know he does, maybe even respond to this if I'm lucky. You won't come out of that bubble though won't you Michael. That protective bubble of keeping me blocked because you can't handle getting your ass blasted. 

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Featured

Russians penetrated U.S. Voter Systems says DHS by ACommissionReviewer, journal

Going 0 for 4 Here Michael by ACommissionReviewer, journal

Doing the Tango Again Michael? by ACommissionReviewer, journal

Hi Michael, Thanks for the Response. by ACommissionReviewer, journal

Michael Falls for Fake News AGAIN by ACommissionReviewer, journal